This website is only accessable on large screens

There are many charts and diagrams on this website that can't be displayed on a small screen like your mobile phone.

Therefore, we advise you to return to this website using a desktop, large tablet or laptop computer.

Or you can download the online PDF report by clicking the button below.

Download LROI annual report

Share link to return later

To LROI website

Revision within 1 year

By type of revision
Overall revision per hospital
Major revision per hospital
Reasons for revision by type of revision

Hip » Survival » Revision within 1 year » By type of revision

TABLE Cumulative 1-year revision percentage of primary total hip arthroplasties by type of revision in the Netherlands in 2014-2018 (n=148,646)

	Cumulative 1-year revision percentage
	Competing Risk (95% CI)	Kaplan Meier (95% CI)
Any type of revision¹	1.8 (1.7-1.9)	1.8 (1.7-1.9)
Major revision²	1.1 (1.0-1.1)	1.1 (1.0-1.1)
Minor revision³	0.7 (0.7-0.7)	0.7 (0.7-0.7)

¹ Any type of revision includes minor and major revisions as well as revision procedures that could not be classified as minor or major revision.
² Revision of at least the acetabulum or femur component.
³ Only inlay and/or femoral head exchange (including DAIR procedures).
THA: total hip arthroplasty; CI: confidence interval.

In 2014-2018, 1,879 (1.3%) primary THAs were implanted in patients who died within one year after the primary procedure.

Hip » Survival » Revision within 1 year » Overall revision per hospital

FIGURE Funnel plot of proportion of hip revision arthroplasties within one year after a total hip arthroplasty per hospital in the Netherlands in 2014-2018 (n=148,522)

Please note: The proportions of revisions within 1 year per hospital were adjusted for casemix factors age, gender, ASA score and diagnosis (osteoarthritis versus other).

THA: total hip arthroplasty; CI: confidence interval.

The mean 1-year revision percentage is 1.8 (95% CI: 1.7-1.9 ) in the Netherlands in 2014-2018. Confidence intervals indicate the plausible range of outcome if all hospitals perform equally well.

Hip » Survival » Revision within 1 year » Major revision per hospital

FIGURE Funnel plot of proportion of hip major revision arthroplasties within one year after a total hip arthroplasty per hospital in the Netherlands in 2014-2018 (n=148,522)

Please note: Major revision is defined as revision of at least acetabulum or femur compenent.\nPlease note: The proportions of revisions within 1 year per hospital were adjusted for casemix factors age, gender, ASA score and diagnosis (osteoarthritis versus other).

THA: total hip arthroplasty; CI: confidence interval.

The mean 1-year revision percentage is 1.2 (95% CI: 1.2-1.2 ) in the Netherlands in 2014-2018. Confidence intervals indicate the plausible range of outcome if all hospitals perform equally well.

Hip » Survival » Revision within 1 year » Reasons for revision by type of revision

TABLE Reasons for revision within one year in patients that underwent a hip revision arthroplasty by type of revision in the Netherlands in 2014-2018

	Major revision¹ (n=1,635)	Minor revision² (n=1,053)	Any type of revision³ (n=2,732)
Reasons for revision	Proportion⁴ (%)	Proportion⁴ (%)	Proportion⁴ (%)
Infection	12.9	67.1	34.1
Dislocation	34.4	18.1	27.6
Peri-prosthetic fracture	30.3	1.8	19.0
Loosening of femur component	20.6	0.5	12.6
Loosening of acetabulum component	10.0	0.4	6.1
Girdlestone situation	2.6	0.1	1.6
Inlay wear	1.3	1.1	1.2
Peri-articular ossification	0.7	0.5	0.6
Symptomatic MoM bearing	0.1	0.0	0.1
Other	10.2	14.3	11.7

¹ Revision of at least the acetabulum or femur component.
² Only inlay and/or femoral head exchange (including DAIR procedures).
³ Any type of revision includes minor and major revisions as well as revision procedures that could not be classified as minor or major revision.
4 One patient may have more than one reason for revision or re-surgery. As such, the total proportion is over 100%.